WSJ Acknowledges Apex’s Expertise and Value in GHG and Sustainability Verification

Once a hippie buzzword commonly associated with kale, recycling, and farmers’ markets, “green” is now a household term at many of the largest and most innovative companies in the world. From top Fortune 500 companies to private firms large and small, sustainability and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) are now critical components and core elements of mission statements, core values, and investment strategies.

Solar panels on top of office buildingAs organizations work to meet existing (and developing) reporting requirements, they are turning to firms who possess expertise in both building programs and verifying results. In their recent article “Companies Turn to Auditors to Verify Sustainability Data” published on June 10, 2021, the Wall Street Journal named Apex as one such expert in the field, and a partner in ESG verification for companies such as Apple, CVS Health, and Amazon. A silver verification provider accredited with CDP, Apex provides support for GHG standards including ISO14064, ISAE 3000, AA1000, GRI, SASB, TCFD, CDP, WRI/WBCSD Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard and related programs.

Apex Sustainability Lead Auditor Chris Ostermann, who has been working and leading such audits for over 10 years commented—“We are seeing a significant uptick in the number of companies reporting publicly and having their reporting assured by third parties. This has paralleled with an increase in the metrics that are being assured. Also, in order to meet the expanding requirements of ESG verification, assurance providers need to be extremely well versed across multiple standards and reporting requirements such as GHG Protocol, GRI, SASB, and TCFD.”

Cargo ship terminal, Unloading crane of cargo ship terminal, Industrial port with containers and container ship.As the G-7 nations of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK, and the US come closer to establishing global standards for the disclosure of corporate environmental data, companies are already feeling the pressure to disclose, as Deloitte reported in their 2020 Resources Study. According to that study, over 60% of respondents surveyed felt increased pressure from stakeholders to disclose and/or address climate risk, and of those, roughly 90% had already taken steps to manage and measure those risks.

As we move closer to a more transparent society with increased pressure for public disclosure of many facets of your business, it becomes increasingly clear—greener and cleaner is the path forward. Apex is proud to be a leader in this space, and we are excited for what this means for the future—a keener eye for waste reductions pre- and post-manufacturing, reduction in energy usage, a more responsible supply chain, and products that are inherently better for the environment—produced by companies that measure what matters.

Zweig 2021 Hot Firm Award Winner

Hot FirmApex Companies, LLC is honored to receive the 2021 Zweig Group’s Hot Firm Award for the second consecutive year. The Hot Firm List honors the fastest-growing firms in the architecture, engineering, planning, environmental, and construction (AEC) industry. Firms are ranked based on three-year growth in revenue, by both percentage and dollar growth.

Apex also ranks among ENR’s Top 30 All-Environmental Firms (#13 in 2020).

See the complete list of the 2021 Hot Firm winners.

PFAS Proposed Regulation and What it Means For You

Apex hosted a webinar with SGS on Wednesday June 9th 2021, during which we shared some predictions regarding the future of PFAS.

Like clockwork, on the following day EPA announced three new actions to reduce the potential risks to the public from PFAS. The actions include issuing a proposed rule to gather data on more than 1,000 PFAS manufactured in the US, withdrawing a guidance that weakened the EPA’s July 2020 Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) restricting certain long-chain PFAS, and publishing a final rule to officially include three additional PFAS into the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI).
Graphic depicting products manufactured using PFAS

PFAS Manufacturing

The EPA’s proposed rule will collect data from manufacturers of PFAS. It would require all manufacturers and importers of PFAS since 2011 to report information to EPA, including the chemical identity, categories of use, volumes manufactured and processed, byproducts, environmental and health effects, worker exposure, and disposal. This rule would provide EPA with additional data to support future regulatory and research efforts. The proposed deadline for reporting the PFAS data to the EPA is one year following the effective date of the final rule. A public comment period is currently open for 60 days.

What does this mean for you?
If your company manufactures products containing PFAS, or did after 2011, the new rule will mean that you need to track down significant information—think bills of lading, waste manifests, industrial hygiene monitoring reports, and manufacturing records. Even if the final rule does not include an exhaustive list or if it does not require detailed or year by year information, this is likely to come at a cost to many manufacturers. Not to mention that if puts a target on a lot of backs for future investigation and remediation activities.

PFAS SNUR

In accordance with Biden’s Executive Orders and other directives, the EPA has withdrawn a compliance guide that weakened the July 2020 SNUR. This SNUR prohibits companies from importing certain long-chain PFAS as part of a surface coating on items without EPA review and approval. The compliance guide was issued in January 2021 in the last days of the Trump Administration and limited what could be considered a surface coating. EPA has indicated they believe that this guide was issued by political officials and was not deemed necessary by career staff. In addition, the guide was finalized without considering or addressing public comments. EPA’s July 2020 SNUR continues to be in effect.

What does this mean for you?
For most, not much. The compliance guide only provided flexibility on a limited list of products that could contain PFAS in their surface coatings, including automotive parts, carpet, furniture and electric components. If your company imports products that contain certain long-chain PFAS as a surface coating, then you likely need to review the SNUR in greater detail to determine if it applies to you.
Graphic depicting where products with PFAS are manufactured, where they are used, and where they end up in the environment

PFAS Reporting to TRI

For TRI Reporting Year 2021 (due July 1, 2022), three additional PFAS have been added to the TRI list because they are now subject to a SNUR under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

The three PFAS added to the list include:

  1. Perfluorooctyl iodide (CAS No. 507-63-1)
  2. Potassium perfluorooctanoate (CAS No. 2395-00-8)
  3. Silver(I) perfluorooctanoate (CAS No. 335-93-3).

What does this mean for you?
Prior to 2020, the TRI did not include any PFAS. In December 2019, EPA added 172 PFAS for the 2020 reporting year, and the three just added bring the list up to 175 PFAS for the 2021 reporting year. Since TRI reports are due annually on July 1st, if your industry is in a covered sector and exceeds certain workforce and chemical thresholds, you will need to include any of the 172 PFAS added in 2020 to this year’s annual report. These additional three PFAS won’t need to be included in your TRI report to EPA until 2022. To determine if your industry is covered you can review the list of NAICS codes in 40 CFR 372.23. A full list of all TRI Toxic Chemicals and the year they were added is also available on the EPA’s website.

To learn more about our referenced webinar please feel free to reach out to us directly, or download our slides.

Capabilities Inquiry