EPA Takes Additional Water Actions as Part of Its PFAS Strategic Roadmap

Adding Five PFAS to Contaminated Site Cleanup Tables

In April 2022, the EPA published three additional water commitments as part of its PFAS Strategic Roadmap. The update includes a new method to screen for PFAS in water at the parts per billion level. The new method, Screening Method for the Determination of Adsorbable Organic Fluorine (AOF) in Aqueous Matrices by Combustion Ion Chromatography (CIC) will measure the total concentration of substances containing a carbon-fluorine bond. This draft method EPA 1621 has been successfully validated by a single laboratory. Multi-laboratory validation will be completed in the summer of 2022 and the EPA intends to publish an updated method later in 2022. Existing methods report at the parts per trillion level now for target analytes, so this new method will be used mostly for screening; Apex Companies has successfully utilized EPA 1621 as an additional screening method to determine potential PFAS mass not accounted for by the standard compound list.

In a memorandum published on April 28, 2022, the EPA also published revised guidance for addressing PFAS in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits where EPA is the permit issuer and control authority. For applicable industrial direct dischargers, effluent must be monitored during draft EPA method 1633 and results must be reported on Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs). Draft method 1621 can also be used in conjunction with draft method 1633, if appropriate. Dischargers with permits must also follow best management practices (BMPs) with specific BMPs for PFAS-containing firefighting foams. These BMPs include:

  1. Prohibiting the use of AFFFs in stormwater permitted activities other than for actual firefighting;
  2. Eliminating PFOA- and PFOS-containing AFFF; and
  3. Requiring immediate cleanup in all situations where AFFFs have been used, including diversions and other measures that prevent discharges via storm sewer systems.

Finally, as part of the April 2022 PFAS Strategic Roadmap update, EPA is also developing national recommended ambient water quality criteria for PFOA and PFOS. They have published draft criteria (chronic criteria include 94,000 ng/L PFOA and 8,400 ng/L PFOS over a 4-day average and not to exceed more than once in three years). The draft criteria also include fish tissue recommendations to protect aquatic life from bioaccumulation. Following the comment period, the EPA intends to issue final PFOA and PFOS recommended criteria.

More recently, on May 18, 2022, EPA added five PFAS (PFOA, PFOS, HFPO-DA [GenX], PFNA and PFHxS) to the Contaminated Site Cleanup Tables or Regional Screening Levels (RSL) Generic Tables. The new tables can be downloaded in PDF or XLS format. The EPA selected levels using the most updated information from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR) 2021 toxicological profiles and final peer reviewed EPA toxicity values.

RSLs are used to identify sites that may require further investigation and Regional Removal Management Levels are used to support EPA’s decision for removal action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This update also includes several chemicals with new toxicity values that have been added based on ATSDR updates and several with toxicity changes based on EPA Office of Water updates. The EPA is also working on updating health advisory levels for PFOA and PFOS and to develop a proposed PFAS National Drinking Water Regulation for publication in fall 2022.

EPA Regional Screening Levels (TR=1E-06, THQ=1.0)
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Resident Soil (mg/kg) Industrial Soil (mg/kg) Tapwater
(ng/L)
Protection of Groundwater SSL (mg/kg)
~Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA) 0.23 3.5 60 –
~Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) 19 250 6000 0.0019
~Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) 1.3 16 390 0.00017
~Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) 0.19 2.5 59 0.00025
~Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) 0.13 1.6 40 0.000038
~Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) 0.19 2.5 60 0.00091

EPA Regional Management Levels (TR=1E-04, THQ=3.0)
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Resident Soil (mg/kg) Industrial Soil (mg/kg) Tapwater
(ng/L)
~Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA) 0.70 11 180
~Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) 57 740 18000
~Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) 3.8 49 1200
~Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) 0.57 7.4 180
~Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) 0.38 4.9 120
~Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) 0.57 7.4 180

EPA Draft Recommended Freshwater Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria for PFOA and PFOS
Criteria Component Acute Water Column (CMC)1 Chronic Water Column (CCC)2 Invertebrate Whole‑Body Fish Whole-Body Fish Muscle
PFOA Magnitude 49 mg/L 0.094 mg/L 1.11 mg/kg ww 6.10 mg/kg ww 0.125 mg/kg ww
PFOS Magnitude 3.0 mg/L 0.0084 mg/L 0.937 mg/kg ww 6.75 mg/kg ww 2.91 mg/kg ww
Duration 1-hour average 4-day average Instantaneous3
Frequency Not to be exceeded more than once in three years, on average Not to be exceeded more than once in three years, on average Not to be exceeded more than once in ten years, on average

Source: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-04/pfoa-pfos-draft-factsheet-2022.pdf

mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram (parts per million).
ng/L = Nanograms per liter (parts per trillion).
mg/L = Milligrams per liter (parts per million).

Keep following our blog for important updates as we continue to follow the EPA’s and state actions on PFAS.

1 Criterion Maximum Concentration.
2 Criterion Continuous Concentration.
3 Tissue data provide instantaneous point measurements that reflect integrative accumulation of PFOA or PFOS over time and space in aquatic life population(s) at a given site.

A Timeline of Recent Stormwater Regulatory Policies

The earliest law to address water quality in the United States was the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948, which in 1972 was amended and became known as the Clean Water Act (CWA). The CWA is the primary law governing stormwater, but it is complimented, or some may argue, complicated, by various state and local laws that have also been enacted in more recent years, often with more stringent regulatory requirements. The following timeline provides an overview of some of the more recent developments in stormwater policy that may affect your business. For additional information, we invite you to contact us, and to follow our blog for updates to this timeline, and our other useful resources.

Stormwater Regulatory Policies

2015
Clean Water Rule or Waters of the US (WOTUS) rule passed by EPA and the United States Army Corps of Engineers

Clean Water Rule or Waters of the US (WOTUS) rule passed by EPA and the United States Army Corps of Engineers

Federal Policy/Regulation

Expands the Clean Water Act (CWA) to include wetlands, smaller ephemeral streams, including compliance for discharges into dry streams, thereby increasing stormwater compliance exposure.

2015
Industrial Permit Requires Certified Registered Professional (QISP) to Implement the Permit

Industrial Permit requires Qualified Industrial Stormwater Practitioner (QISP) for permit implementation

California Policy/Regulation

Only QISP certified stormwater professionals can perform Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) functions, requiring additional expertise to implement permits.

2017
President Trump issues Executive Order to roll back WOTUS rule issued in 2015

President Trump issues Executive Order to roll back WOTUS rule issued in 2015

Federal Policy/Regulation

Reversion to narrower definition of which water bodies are regulated under the CWA, primarily impacting the industry and farming communities.

2018
Addition of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) into the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits by the California State Water Resources Control Board

Addition of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) into the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits by the California State Water Resources Control Board

California Policy/Regulation

NPDES Permits include numerical limits and exceedances carry financial penalties. Clients must install best management practices (BMPs) to ensure discharges are not exceeding limits.

2020
Maui Case: Point source discharge to a jurisdictional water through groundwater

Maui Case: Point source discharge to a jurisdictional water through groundwater

Federal Policy/Regulation

The case asked whether the CWA requires a permit when pollutants that originate from a non-point source can be traced to reach navigable waters through mechanisms such as groundwater transport. The ruling by the US Supreme Court that non-point source discharges do require a permit when they are equivalent to direct discharges increases compliance exposure for infiltration BMPs, establishing connectivity between stormwater and groundwater. Those who discharge must ensure no direct or indirect connection to a surface water viaĀ groundwater.

2021
Corona Clay case ruling expands of citizens ability to sue for violations of CWA

Corona Clay case ruling expands of citizens ability to sue for violations of CWA

California Policy/Regulation

Similar to the Maui Case, the ruling by California’s 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that previously occurring CWA violations could be brought to suit by private citizens increasing risk of litigation for ongoing or historical discharges.

2021
Biden Administration Executive Order: Reinstates 2015 USACOE broad definition of WOTUS

Biden Administration Executive Order: Reinstates 2015 USACOE broad definition of WOTUS

Federal Policy/Regulation

Biden’s reinstatement of the 2015 WOTUS rule expands the definition of a waterbody under the CWA to include smaller ephemeral streams, and requires compliance for discharges into dry streams and dry ditches.

2021
Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) revised and updated to include Universal Benchmark Monitoring, public signage, and technology‑based effluent limits

Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) revised and updated to include universal benchmark monitoring, public signage, and technology‑based effluent limits

Federal Policy/Regulation

The MSGP is beginning to look more like the California Industrial General Permit (IGP). Those outside of California who are covered under the MSGP or other state permits will be required to implement more BMPs, monitoring, and actions. State permits cannot be less stringent than the federal MSGP.

2021
Voters approve ā€œMeasure Wā€, which created a special parcel tax in the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) to fund stormwater Capture and Reuse Projects

Voters approve “Measure W,” which created a special parcel tax in the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) to fund stormwater capture and reuse projects

California Policy/Regulation

This measure is the first large-scale stormwater fee system to capture and reuse stormwater in the west. Businesses can seek parcel tax reductions, engineer infiltration features, or reuse stormwater to reduce parcelĀ taxes.

2023
Great Blue Heron in a frenzied water bath in a wetland that is part of the waters of the United States (WOTUS) and Clean Water Act.

The Supreme Court delivers a decision limiting the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) jurisdiction to enforce the Clean Water Act (CWA) as it relates to wetlands in the United States.

Federal Policy/Regulation

The specific case, Sackett v. EPA, involved a couple who were fined for filling in a wetland without a permit on a residential property they purchased in 2003.

Capabilities Inquiry